In his weekly column last week, Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman (R) continued his obstructionist attitude against the Affordable Health Care Act (Obamacare). Heineman cited the delay in the implementation of the employer mandate as a sign that , “Obamacare is in deep trouble.”
The fact is that the Administration delayed the mandate to afford employers another year to work out the details. Hardly a sign that the entire Affordable Health Care Act is in trouble.
Heineman went on to say, “Here in Nebraska, Obamacare will have a toll on taxpayers, through increased premiums for hard-working, middle income Nebraska families. Additionally, the current Medicaid provisions alone will cost the taxpayers millions in coming years.”
Using the buzz words “hard-working, middle income Nebraska families” to make his point about the Medicaid expansion in Obamacare, Heineman is pitting the so-called middle class against the elderly and poor who rely on Medicaid. He neglected to say that Nebraska has refused to implement the Medicaid expansion and refused to implement the health insurance exchange.
Heineman also cited a poll and stated, “(the) Lincoln poll of rural Nebraskans found that 54 percent of the respondents believe that the country will be worse off under the new law while only 9 percent thought we would be better off.”
Well, duh Dave. You have been railing against Obamacare since it was passed and, after all, Nebraska is a politically conservative state. When you conduct a campaign of misinformation and obstruction, that is the response you will get.
Here is the reality of health care and health insurance Dave. I am retired and am two years away from Medicare. My wife just retired and is four years away from Medicare. We just met with a representative of Blue Cross two days ago to try and determine what to do for health insurance. We have three options:
1) We continue the coverage we had from my wife’s employer (similar to COBRA) at a cost of $1000/month.
2) We get a new policy with a higher deductible and less benefits at an estimated cost of $600/month.
3) We get a temporary policy similar to option #2, however with fewer benefits.
Under options #2 and #3 we would be required to have physicals and any preexisting conditions would be excluded from coverage.
Here’s the bottom line Dave. I will start Social Security in September and my entire check will go to health insurance costs. Since you refused to implement the health insurance exchange we will have to use the federal option to shop for health insurance in January. But, because politicians like you have demagogued and sabotaged the Affordable Health Care Act, I don’t hold out much hope that the premiums will be competitive and for that you are a butthead. Just one day more...