My comment was, "The moment of skepticism and enlightenment in the religious high school I attended is when I was taught the entitlement of "manifest destiny" - the belief that the entire North American continent was allotted to the white settlers by God, justifying the genocide of the American Indians. When I questioned it I was told it was "God's will." My attendance at that school ended shortly thereafter."
The author of the essay also cited various atrocities that have been committed in the name of religion, which reminded me of being taught the claim of "manifest destiny."
Children are easily influenced and this has not been lost on religions. It boils down to the difference between education and indoctrination. The first mission of religious schools is to indoctrinate the young to their ideology and, as the author of the essay pointed out, using the fear of eternal damnation as the hammer.
This indoctrination is not limited to religious schools. In public schools we are indoctrinated to believe that this country is superior to all others and are compelled to give over our loyalty. In Nebraska the pledge of allegiance to the flag is quasi-mandatory with a law that requires that time be allocated daily for the recitation. Memorization of the songs America the Beautiful and the Star Spangled Banner are required by law. Each school is also required by law to have a "committee on patriotism."
Just as the religious zealots have used indoctrination to influence children in education, so the zealot patriots have used indoctrination. "Manifest destiny", being taught as a claimed right, crossed both religion and the superiority of one nation over another.
There is a better alternative to indoctrination: promote independent and critical thinking. There is no hope independent thinking will be taught in religious education, but it should be in public education.
Thanks Rick for stimulating some independent and critical thinking today.
Just one day more...




































